Making lawyers judges biases the judicial system
Many
lawyers who defend habitual criminals BECOME JUDGES in the normal
course of events. Our justice system mandates lawyers to defend
criminals by using all methods fair and foul. Successful lawyers are
invited by the Bar Council to become judges.
Such judges have an inclination to obstruct the prosecution, enable destruction of evidence and intimidation of witnesses, to help criminals go scot-free... don't they?
Many judges at all levels of judiciary, including chief justices, have such track records. By throwing procedural obstructions in the path of prosecution with endless adjournments and stay orders, and knowingly creating circumstances for destruction of evidence and intimidation of prosecution witnesses, they help criminals escape punishment.
Such judges have an inclination to obstruct the prosecution, enable destruction of evidence and intimidation of witnesses, to help criminals go scot-free... don't they?
Many judges at all levels of judiciary, including chief justices, have such track records. By throwing procedural obstructions in the path of prosecution with endless adjournments and stay orders, and knowingly creating circumstances for destruction of evidence and intimidation of prosecution witnesses, they help criminals escape punishment.
This fatal flaw
in our judicial system is generally overlooked. We need to change this
grave flaw in the system of appointing judges.
Comments
Post a Comment