Justice Karnan's contemptuous reply to SC's contempt notice
Mumbai,
12th February, 2017: Justice CS Karnan's reply to Supreme
Court's contempt notice is heroically contemptuous. Based on
this reply, one expects that the contempt hearing of India's
judge-gone-berserk will probably have sensational disclosures about
allegedly corrupt judges, particularly Chief Justice of Madras High
Court SK Kaul. One is led to wonder whether Justice Karnan is on
trial here, or India's judiciary is on trial!
Read
Justice Karnan's defiant
reply to the contempt notice.
In
Justice Karnan's reply to the suo motu contempt notice served on him
by a seven-judge bench, he alleges that the
notice issued is (a) bad in law (b) illogical (c) unethical (d) against natural
justice (e) mala fide (f) biased along caste lines, and most importantly, (g) intended to shield
Justice SK Kaul who is about to be elevated to the Supreme Court.
Karnan's reply -- like Arundhat
Roy's defiant reply in 2001 -- is almost certain to be held as
contemptuous by Supreme Court.
In
his earlier letter dated 23rd January, 2017, Justice CS
Karnan furnished the prime minister with "an initial list of
corrupt judges", and in addition, three other officers of Madras
High Court, who he implied had detailed knowledge and proof of
corrupt acts of the 20
judges listed. Justice Karnan asked for the judges,
including some retired judges, to be "interrogated by the
officers of the Central Agencies".
The
nation is keenly watching this case to decide whether:
a)
Justice Karnan is a judge with impaired mental functioning?
If so, what constitutional safeguards exist to prevent him from
heavily damaging the reputation and function of the higher
judiciary? OR
b)
Or Justice Karnan is a whistleblower revealing rampant corruption?
And if so, what constitutional mechanisms do we have to conduct
proper investigation against the 20 judges he has named?
ISSUED
IN PUBLIC INTEREST BY
Krishnaraj Rao
9821588114
krish.kkphoto@gmail.com
Krishnaraj Rao
9821588114
krish.kkphoto@gmail.com
I am a lawyer and appeared in many cases in supreme court and numerous high court, but i can easily sense the smell of biasedness in judicial system.He is actually a whitle blower but dont know how he will succeed by standing alone as a CELL from the entire judicial ORGAN of constitutuon. When other ORGANS of the INDIAN body is also in corruption.
ReplyDelete