The Brave Pedestrian

Discussion of judicial reforms cannot be the sole preserve of eminent jurists. The unavailability of judiciary to the common man and his family members deeply concerns their Life & Liberty. This alone gives common people every right to discuss the deficiencies of the judiciary... and not necessarily in respectful tones! Like  ·  Comment  ·  Share

So far, judicial reform has been discussed in gentle voices by jurists, to no avail. So it is necessary and urgent that the common man speak his mind about judicial reform, and not necessarily in gentle tones. Because, the bottomline is, judiciary exists to serve the common man, and he is NOT being served! Like  ·  Comment  ·  Share

In the context of having public discussions about judiciary's shortcomings... Like  ·  Comment  ·  Share

Even firebrand journalists avoid reporting on or writing editorials on the glaring foibles of the judiciary, because being held in contempt jeopardizes their career. And of course because media houses don't give them any opportunities to criticize the judiciary, in the first place. It is considered too risky... and media houses, after all, are commercial ventures and not crusaders. Like  ·  Comment  ·  Share