The Brave Pedestrian

Mumbai, 13th April, 2018: The MahaRERA order of 5th April is a victory for victims of Bhagtani Serenity, because it grants the reliefs sought by the complainants. It directs JVPD Properties to refund the amounts paid by the complainants towards booking a flat in Serenity, along with interest @ 10.05% and also Rs 20,000/- towards costs. Well hurrah, we got what we asked for. Or did we? Let us think about how things will play out in future. Does anybody believe that complainant Pradeep Badkur (and others like him who will receive similar orders very shortly) will receive the money from Bhagtani? Not likely. Under the current circumstances, it is almost guaranteed that Bhagtani will respond to this order with typical non-compliance. What can the complainant do if Bhagtani does not refund the money? Civil contempt proceedings have to be initiated against JVPD Properties in a civil court.  (Please note, the contempt proceedings will have to be against the company JVPD Propert...

Mumbai, 8th April, 2018: Yes, we are all talking about how the builder who buys Serenity project from Xander Finance (or Debt Recovery Tribunal) should complete the project and give flats to the allottees. But keep in mind that the consideration value of the project will depend on the development potential of the project land. Do we know what its development potential is? Let us first understand the contradictions in our case. According to Diipesh Bhagtani's second affidavit to Bombay High Court, Serenity project has 389 allottees.  However, Bhagtani's declaration to MahaRERA, visible on its website, says something very different. It says that Serenity project has only 86 flats and zero booked apartments i.e. zero allottees. Nobody would accuse Bhagtani of telling the truth, and so such self-contradictions were to be expected. However, these inconsistent figures raise an inconvenient question: Does the project site of Serenity have enough land to acc...

Mumbai, 7th January, 2018: Diipesh Bhagtani's two affidavits are like bikinis -- what they reveal is interesting but what they conceal is crucial. The two bikini affidavits in Bombay High Court are signed by Diipesh Bhagtani alone, in his individual capacity and not as a director of multiple corporate entities. This conceals dozens of important facts and connections. These affidavits give a superficial semblance of truthfulness and transparency, but the only thing that they do is misdirect your attention. Jo dikhta hai woh hai nahin , aur jo hai woh dikhta nahin hai. Got it? Download and read Diipesh Bhagtani's FIRST affidavit: http://bit.ly/2q37Dw5 This is the affidavit wherein, pursuant to the hearing held on 29th September, Diipesh, "along with other applicants", undertook to deposit Rs 22 crore in six equal installments in six months with the registrar of the high court, towards "settlement of the entire dispute" to be "paid off to th...